12 comments

1. 

   Jason W.

   March 10, 2013

   So Warner Bros. is basically just giving away crap from all their worst superhero movies?

2. 

   Julian

   March 10, 2013

   Of ourselves they donate the worst costumes ever, but throw them in with the superman suit hoping nobody notices.

3. 

   Michael John Petty

   March 10, 2013

   Very cool. I'd still like to see it, regardless if it were part of a bad movie, it's still Batman!

   1. 

      BatmanNewsChris

      March 10, 2013

      Good point!

4. 

   sergio

   March 10, 2013

   por dios estos tendrian que devolver la plata a todas las personas que la fueron a ver por ser la peor pelicula de la saga de Batman

   by god they would have to return the money to all the people who came to see for being the worst movie of the saga of Batman

   1. 

      Bane

      March 10, 2013

      Para mi, fue la punta mas baja de mi carrera.

      oh well

5. 

   Gabe

   March 10, 2013

   If I were the Smithsonian, I'd probably tell Warner Bros to go [high-five] themselves.

6. 

   diogo02000

   March 10, 2013

   The movie sucks, but the cowl are very cool.

7. 

   ED

   March 11, 2013

   Christopher Reeves' Superman costume I get, he defined that character. But Berry and Clooney's costumes I'm don't think are worthy.

   1. 

      J

      July 21, 2013

      It should be the The Batmobile from Batman '89 instead of Clooney's mask, and Linda Carter's Wonder Woman tiara, bracelets and lasso instead of Halle Berry's Catwoman costume.

8. 

   Drew Douglas

   March 11, 2013

   The movie sucks but it would still be cool to say you own something from it.

9. 

   Antrozous

   March 14, 2013

   The Batman cowl is fine without Clooney´s eyes and chin poping out of it. On the other hand Hale Berry´s Catwoman costume should be incinerated not displayed!