Is Gal Gadot headed to Gotham in 'Wonder Woman'?

By

·

April 28, 2016

New Wonder Woman set photos suggest that Gal Gadot could be headed to Gotham in her new movie. The actress was photographed filming a scene on Tuesday at a museum in Paris, France. Fans noticed that there's a truck in the scene that appears to have a Wayne Enterprises logo on it.

Update: In the better photo above, you can clearly see that it's a Wayne Enterprises logo. Based on the license plate, it seems like billionaire Bruce Wayne has offices and trucks all over the world, which makes sense for a company of its size. But if Wonder Woman does take a trip to Gotham, could we be getting a Ben Affleck cameo as Bruce Wayne or Batman too?

It's too early to know anything for sure at this point, but let me hear your theories in the comments below!

This is an archive of Batman-News.com from 2010 to 2025. For the latest news, check out BatmanNews.com

207 comments

BatmanNewsChris
April 28, 2016
That was me for 10 minutes straight before I decided to write this article.
1. BatmanNewsChris
  April 28, 2016
  You have to wait at least 24 hours to get your account approved and they don't just hand out photos for free. They cost 100s of dollars each.
  1. DeanDouglas
    May 1, 2016
    Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
    aka all BvS coverage since it's comic con announcement.
Makiesan
April 28, 2016
There was a Wayne satellite in Man of Steel...Wayne Enterprises is not only in Gotham. Like Mcdonalds, it is everywhere.
1. Ashraf Anam
  April 28, 2016
  Yep, it's just might be that.
2. Alan Conn
  April 28, 2016
  Wayne Enterprise... The new McDonalds.
3. Anne Fisher
  April 29, 2016
  Good point. Also, the truck is kind of one of those bank trucks, or trucks used for moving things you want to keep secure-- like high-tech items or other valuables.
  And Metropolis IS just across the inlet from Gotham, so it could also be there. But I prefer your idea of it being a multi-national company, so that should not limit it to Gotham.
SPEK
April 28, 2016
My guess is that Bruce is either loaning to or purchasing something from a French museum, hence what appears to be an armored car from Wayne Enterprises. He could also be using that as a cover to investigate something in France
Kal-Il AKA Ultraman
April 28, 2016
NO! No Batman in this movie. For gods sake, we don´t have to see Batman in every damn movie now. This is Wonder Womans movie and it should be hers and hers alone. No Batman, no Superman nothing. Just Wonder Woman without the help of any other male superhero icon to prop up that movie. Fans have been waiting too damn long for this movie for it to be anything less then a pure Wonder Woman solo movie. NO Batman !
1. turtle6988
  April 28, 2016
  What if the whole Wonder Woman movie is Diana telling Bruce her story?
  1. BatmanNewsChris
    April 28, 2016
    Ooooh I like that idea!
    1. doubt it
      April 28, 2016
      i dont think she would tell him though. if it involves love which we think it does then its private for her
  2. Ashraf Anam
    April 28, 2016
    That would be a better plot than just showing her story since DC Films are all said to be interwoven and interconnected.
  3. Justice_Rises
    April 28, 2016
    That actually sounds like a cool idea!
  4. turtle6988
    April 28, 2016
    Whoever had the idea first its a good idea. Its a good way to tie things together
  5. The Dark Knight
    April 28, 2016
    Excellent idea. And then they get going to find other metas by the end of the movie and the JL picks up from there!
  6. Kal-Il AKA Ultraman
    April 28, 2016
    lol thats not ripping off Iron Man 3 at all xD
    1. The Dark Knight
      April 29, 2016
      Except IM3 wasn't something you'd narrate to your friend as your experience story. WW's history would be a perfect startup for Bruce knowing more about Diana. After all she has yet to answer "who are you" "where have you been" questions from that stupid email scene
  7. Sisyphus
    April 29, 2016
    Yea that sounds cool.. Maybe they could dedicate a few scenes to lay foundation to the Justice League movie..
  8. TizianoFerro
    April 29, 2016
    I hope not. Let the movie be about Wonder Woman, and not about her having to 'tell' anyone else a story where the focus should rightfully be on one person: her.
2. Akil Manaz
  April 28, 2016
  We saw a tiny Wayne Enterprises logo. That MUST mean Batman hijacked Wonder Woman's movie; must have been a response to BvS's mixed reception! NOOOO!!! Let's go on a riot
3. gaytrekkie
  April 28, 2016
  They want the movies to be connected. We've already heard that this movie leads directly into Justice League and Batman making a cameo at the end of the WW movie has been a rumor for awhile now.
4. Captain DC
  April 28, 2016
  I agree 100%. The more Batman, the better! https://uploads.disquscdn.c...
  1. The Dark Knight
    April 29, 2016
    Wtf? That looks like Robin cosplaying WW lmoa!
Theclaw Yaww
April 28, 2016
Does Batman really need to be in WW? Answer no and this is probably just like the lexcorp truck in MoS
1. Manque
  April 28, 2016
  The answer is yes. Batman needs to be in everything in my opinion.
  1. Theclaw Yaww
    April 28, 2016
    Really why
    1. Manque
      April 28, 2016
      It's not worth me answering because if you don't already know the answer, then you are a lost soul.
      1. Alan Conn
        April 28, 2016
        Because hes Batman! Why the fuck else?!?!?! Some people, amiright?
      2. Christian Chandia
        April 28, 2016
        You guys are brain dead assholes Batman is overrated. Marvel beats DC now I know why
      3. Alan Conn
        April 29, 2016
        Uh oh guys! This one found us out! Shit! Now what can we do besides worship the almighty Marvel? Haha! Whatever dude. Outta here w that shit.
      4. Theclaw Yaww
        April 28, 2016
        Hey I love Batman but forcing him in every dc movie feels unnecessary
      5. DKnight
        April 28, 2016
        You just think its unnecessary on paper. Batman being in this movie doesn't mean he is being forced. He could play an essential part as he is essential in Suicide Squad. That would probably set up the future Batman films and establish with joker. This movie could establish them looking for the JL together.
      6. Theclaw Yaww
        April 29, 2016
        You do know WW is set in World War I
cstrable
April 28, 2016
They're clearly trying to make him into DCs Robert Downey Jr.
1. Kal-Il AKA Ultraman
  April 28, 2016
  Even Downey is not in every MCU film. In fact he has only been in 7 out of 13 films so far and three of those seven were Iron Man solo movies with two of the seven being Avengers movies. So it makes sense. Marvel is not forcing Downey into every damn movie just to boost sales and popularity. All of his apperances make sense and are well justified.
  1. Jim Shields
    April 28, 2016
    and so far Batfleck has been in 2 of the 4 films that have been made. Assuming that he is going to be recruiting for the League that doesn't sound like too much to me. Stark's influence has been a presence in most of the Marvel movies. Even CA TFA.
    1. Christian Chandia
      April 28, 2016
      You are a idiot. Batman is Batman v Superman, Suicide Squad, Justice League and now Wonder Woman.
      How the Fuck is your math??
    2. The Dark Knight
      April 29, 2016
      2*/3
      WW isn't clear yet
  2. iAbeLincoln
    April 28, 2016
    ONLY in 7/13? I have no problem with him being in the movies because yes it seems to fit him in well, but if this becomes an argument about Batman being in too many of the DC stand alone films then the comparison is justified.
  3. 12stepCornelius
    April 28, 2016
    Tony will be in Spider-Man HC so that's 8 now.
  4. gaytrekkie
    April 28, 2016
    Batman is a much more pivotal character in DCU then Iron Man is for MCU, so I don't mind that he's in every movie, especially considering that he's the one putting together the Justice League.
  5. The Dark Knight
    April 29, 2016
    Maybe Batfleck in WW will make more sense than the Incredible Hulk cameo... We'll have to wait I guess
Jim Shields
April 28, 2016
It is possible that Wayne financial is worldwide.Not just limited to Gotham.
Fer León
April 28, 2016
Since Wayne Enterprises it's a worldwide company to see a truck with the logo doesn't mean necessarily that Bruce/Batman needs to be there.
1. larva
  April 28, 2016
  Yup
2. TizianoFerro
  April 29, 2016
  Completely agree
Kryptonian Knight
April 28, 2016
OVERREACTION TIME!!! When will people chill out, relax and just wait and see? Never. There will always be those who panick over nothing and opine in the extreme without any information. Maybe it's just a Wayne Enterprises truck in the background as some type of Easter egg? Maybe she meets Bruce? Or maybe she meets The Batman in action? Nobody knows right? The question I care about is does it enhance the story? Is the purpose connecting the dots to JL or are they just forcing Batman in a movie? The purpose is the key for me so I will just wait and chill until that time comes.
1. Opinion Slayer
  April 28, 2016
  Some people just don't know how to
2. Commander Shepard
  April 28, 2016
  The Internet's reply:
  https://45.media.tumblr.com...
3. larva
  April 28, 2016
  Yeah.
  http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-G...
4. The Dark Knight
  April 28, 2016
  My guess is they'll have Batman cameo in as many movies as possible. Atleast Batman cameo in Flash movie is confirmed
  1. TRON
    April 28, 2016
    Link?
    1. The Dark Knight
      April 29, 2016
      "Just a feeling"
Opinion Slayer
April 28, 2016
Well it could be a flash forward at the end of the movie that leads to The Justice League movie and that would be cool to me.
turtle6988
April 28, 2016
Are you sure that wasnt filming for part of Justice League?
CleonII
April 28, 2016
that might be the justice league shoot going on. not wonder woman.
1. Diego!
  April 28, 2016
  That's very unlikely, when Gal was spotted walking with Patty Jenkins in Paris.
  1. Mark
    April 28, 2016
    Perks of directing this movie: the face of a Gucci line takes you shopping in Paris.
    1. Diego!
      April 28, 2016
      Did anyone say Gucci as in Gucci Bamboo? 😆
      https://45.media.tumblr.com...
      1. Alan Conn
        April 28, 2016
        Hahaha!!!
      2. Mark
        April 28, 2016
        Precisely!
        As I've said before to those who doubt her acting ability, if an Israeli fashion model can't pull off "alluring, exotic and mysterious" there is something wrong with the world. And she did just fine in BvS (and looks fine from the few WW clips that came out).
      3. Diego!
        April 28, 2016
        I loved her as Diana Prince / Wonder Woman. She didn't have many lines but you could feel something enigmatic whenever she was on screen. And she rocked when she was battling Doomsday. Zack chose wisely when he cast Gal 😀
      4. Supafairy
        April 28, 2016
        I'm so glad we dodged the Carano bullet. I have nothing against her but her acting just doesn't scream Princess Diana/Wonder Woman. More like goon side-kick that will kick your ass two-ways from Sunday. That's not really who Wonder Woman is to me.
      5. Diego!
        April 28, 2016
        I agree. Carano did well in Deadpool but she had fewer lines than Gal on BvS. But Carano doesn't fit Wonder Woman. I can see her more as She Hulk.
      6. Supafairy
        April 28, 2016
        I don't know much about she Hulk but Yes, I agree. :)
      7. The Dark Knight
        April 29, 2016
        Exactly, I'd like a muscular and meaty WW myself, but Carano? Wtf? Her face screams "dat villainous bitch", WW is also supposed to be kind and compassionate, Carano is no WW
      8. Supafairy
        April 29, 2016
        Carano is a beautiful woman but I agree. I'm a HUGE WW fan a Gadot was nowhere near my fan casting radar BUT when they announced her, even though she was really skinny at the time I was pleasantly surprised. I looked at some pics that were posted and I was like, you know what, that's my Diana. Her physique never bothered me once, because I was confident that Snyder would get someone to whip her into shape. Maybe because I'm a woman I see the female physique differently, maybe even knowing what her limitations were I never expected her to become a bulging mass of muscles. She's toned, healthy, fit AND dare I say blessed with the beauty of Aphrodite. What more do we want? Lol, ok maybe boobs but as someone with a pair of those, I can assure you those things can be a damn nuisance when you're trying to fight monsters. :p
      9. The Dark Knight
        April 29, 2016
        She looks fine in her WW attire, but her Diana attire exposes her real skinny flat-chested shape.
      10. Supafairy
        May 15, 2016
        It doesn't matter. Having boobs is not part of her character. It's not a superpower. :)
      11. The Dark Knight
        May 16, 2016
        But it matters for Superman and Batman to have ripped bodies and expected to have their respective actors to work out their asses off for months. And not to mention have their dicks pop out in spandex.
        Have a skinny guy play Superman, the internet will go berserk
      12. Supafairy
        May 18, 2016
        But that's the point, they made Gadot work her ass off too. So it's not like she just stepped into the role and stayed the way she was. She had to work out and work hard to get into shape. she can't do much about her boobs aside from having it surgically enhanced and Gadot doesn't seem the type to do that. So, while I understand what you mean, it's not really relevant here. :)
      13. Supafairy
        April 28, 2016
        Hahaha, my husband bought me this perfume for my birthday. I'm very fussy with perfumes and thought this would smell like garbage or old lady. Turns out it actually smells REALLY good. Now I can say I smell like Wonder Woman. :) On a side note I also got the Sideshow Wonder Woman Premium Format statue with it so it was totally a Wonder Woman themed birthday for me. I'm in my 30's. *no regrets*
      14. Diego!
        April 28, 2016
        Indeed it does! I gave one to my mother for her birthday and she loves it too! ☺
Saiyan Soul
April 28, 2016
Wouldn't mind seeing Bats as a cameo in the WW movie~
12stepCornelius
April 28, 2016
Nah, that's Paris she's in. I'm sure Wayne Ent. is also in Europe. This actually appears to be the scene in which Diana is captured on CCTV footage which Lex acquires when she's at the ATM and glances up at the camera. The footage Bruce watches in the Batcave.
1. OGDickGrayson
  April 28, 2016
  That would be cool if the surveillance footage actually had purpose in future films. Then maybe it wouldn't feel so forced on a BvS rewatch.
  1. OGDickGrayson
    April 28, 2016
    It was about the most forced way they could have done it
  2. AquaCthulhu
    May 1, 2016
    I think all the JL cameos will be connected back in the Leaguer's respective solo-films.
2. AquaCthulhu
  May 1, 2016
  She's wearing a different dress though, but then the surveillance footage in BvS did say it was in Paris, France. Rue des Saints.
Meg
April 28, 2016
I think that's just an Easter Egg, like the Wayne satellite in Man of Steel, or at least I hope so. I love the Bat to death, but no needs to jam him in every single movie. If they did that, it wouldn't be long before people got so sick of him to care for his solo movie.
Jesse Hernandez
April 28, 2016
Didn't Justice League start shooting already ? I'm wondering what they're doing, Jason barely reported to the studio, Henry is still training, I think Ben is still finishing up his movie, and Gal is here filming WW, very curious
IamTheOneWhoKnocks
April 28, 2016
Love Batman, but he doesn't need to be in every single movie. As we saw in BvS, WW can hold her own.
Jofer
April 28, 2016
People complaining about Batman cameo in WW . What else can WB do ? The f***ed up BVS big time to the point Ben Affleck´s Batman was the only great thing in that movie . Emo superman still has a lot to learn (not to mention he is still dead ) and we are yet to see WW starring in her own solo movie so yeah out of the 3 Batman is the one ppl are most excited about.
1. Kerk Lastnameless
  April 28, 2016
  "What else can WB do?" -- grow some ballz and learn to take a few risks here and there. They can't have Batman carry their movies forever.
2. Foo-Ko
  April 28, 2016
  Where was that emo-Superman? I did not see it.
  1. Kerk Lastnameless
    April 28, 2016
    You must have overlooked, due to all those special effects. Let me help you -- remember there was a scene with a building burning? Remember there was a flying guy, carrying a woman out of it with an angry and burdened expression on his face? That was him! If it doesn't help, check the trailers, it's there.
    1. Akil Manaz
      April 29, 2016
      He had a smile on his face, you fucking moron
      1. Kerk Lastnameless
        April 29, 2016
        Eat a dick, dipshit.
      2. Akil Manaz
        April 29, 2016
        You mad, bitch? LOOOOOOOOOOL
      3. Kerk Lastnameless
        April 29, 2016
        TROLOLOLOLOLOOOO
Bradley Fenton
April 28, 2016
In BvS she meets Bruce in the museum, looking at an ancient (counterfeit) sword. In HER movie, it looks like she's on a mission to retrieve weapons that may belong to her (if the pictures say anything).
Suh bat
April 28, 2016
Does anyone remember this movie is set in the past
1. Diego!
  April 28, 2016
  It is said it will be covering three different periods of time
2. Nashe
  April 28, 2016
  I don't think they have released the synopsis yet so we don't really know the full details
Diego!
April 28, 2016
I think as we've read in many sites, Wonder Woman will cover many eras in different periods of time. Now it looks as if she is living in our time. In London she was covering first world war and in Italy we've seen her in Themiscyra. WW looks really promising!! I can't wait! ☺☺☺
1. Diego!
  April 28, 2016
  That's very cool! 😀 So WW ends after BvS. Very intriguing! ☺
  1. AquaCthulhu
    May 1, 2016
    Not necessarily. It could even begin after BvS with major flashbacks throughout WW's past.
OGDickGrayson
April 28, 2016
I guess I'm cool with Batman being kind of the Nick Fury of the DCEU. It's still kind of dumb why he's in that position tho.
1. Anon
  April 28, 2016
  You're assuming...
  1. OGDickGrayson
    April 28, 2016
    He's assembling the league "like the seven samurai." I'm not assuming anything it's exactly what Snyder said.
    1. Nashe
      April 28, 2016
      I actually have no idea why this is an actual problem or issue. It's Batman who cracked the files with the Meta Humans. It's him who got the visions from the Flash. And with WW suddenly appearing to help defeat Doomsday it seems to make sense for Batman to get the feeling he needs to assemble a team of "others like you" to combat a future Doomsday like situation. Wonder woman saying "what if they don't want to be found" mirrors her reluctance and her trying not to involve herself. And it's Batman. You think he is going to find out about Meta Humans and not be interested. Especially after "failing him in death" he is taking a less paranoid approach this time to these new people. And Flash was not very subtle. "You have to find us".
      1. Blockhead Jr.
        December 2, 2016
        The question is since his "change" will he be tower of babel/brother eye paranoid or is all that gone?
2. Manque
  April 28, 2016
  How is that a dumb position? Although Superman is the most powerful member, Bruce Wayne has always been the strategist and arguably the leader of the Justice League.
  1. Pix Layer
    April 28, 2016
    Eh, I always thought of Batman and Superman as both leaders of the JL.
    1. Manque
      April 28, 2016
      Exactly. So now that Superman is (temporarily) out of the picture, Batman has to take the reins.
  2. OGDickGrayson
    April 28, 2016
    There is no definitive leader of the league.
    The reason that position is dumb is because WB killed off Superman just to have Batman lead the league. I get if they prefer to have Batman more front and center in the League but killing Superman to do so is bullshit.
    Also I'm not sure I'd say Superman is the most powerful member. He is the strongest but Flash, WW, or MM could certainly take him in a fight.
    1. Manque
      April 28, 2016
      First of all, I said "arguably." Second of all, Superman wasn't killed just to have Batman lead the league. Superman was killed because it's an awesome storyline based on one of the most popular Superman comics to date. Third of all, if Superman wanted it, the Justice League Members would be dead already. ;)
      1. OGDickGrayson
        April 28, 2016
        An awesome storyline that was completely wasted and may not ever be done right on film.
      2. OGDickGrayson
        April 28, 2016
        There was hardly any impact from his death in this. Every Superman fan should have been weeping during this part, but it was weak.
3. Ashraf Anam
  April 28, 2016
  Well, Batman has been confirmed to be the one assembling the JLA. He's kind of the Nick Fury. Superman will return later as the awaited king.
4. Nashe
  April 28, 2016
  Why is it dumb?
Diego!
April 28, 2016
We have a better image now! 😀
Diego!
April 28, 2016
Another one! ☺
Manque
April 28, 2016
I just don't understand how in this day and age someone can take such a bad quality photo
1. larva
  April 28, 2016
  I have a potato too.
  1. Foo-Ko
    April 28, 2016
    http://i.imgur.com/S40bT8o.jpg
2. BatmanNewsChris
  April 28, 2016
  It's just a preview thumbnail image. You have to purchase the full sized photo from the paparazzi agency.
Kerk Lastnameless
April 28, 2016
Why would she go there during WWI? America was not even a party until it was almost over.
1. Kerk Lastnameless
  April 28, 2016
  Ok that's fine. But that still leaves Gotham an unlikely destination for her. Why Gotham of all cities? Isn't she an ambassador? Washington is that way, miss. I'm afraid, this is more mindless tie-inning on their part.
  1. Kerk Lastnameless
    April 28, 2016
    Yeah, they are big, but so what? What the hell does she have to do with the Waynes? That's the point. Batman does not need to be in this movie. Under no flavor, not even by reference.
    1. Kerk Lastnameless
      April 28, 2016
      Because that makes their world smaller. And because his presence adds nothing to her own story.
      1. Caped Baldy
        April 29, 2016
        How do u know Batman presence doesn't add anything to Diana's story??Have u read the script by the any chance???Maybe wait and see before making assumptions.
      2. Kerk Lastnameless
        April 29, 2016
        Making assumptions is fun.
Pix Layer
April 28, 2016
Still don't think Batmam will be in the movie. Probably just a jump to the present day and the Wayne truck acts as some type of connection to the rest of the DCEU.
Piotr Rudnicki
April 28, 2016
How do we know it's not from the Justice League? Aren't they shooting it now as well? I thought WW has been wrapped already
1. Mark
  April 28, 2016
  Because Gal and Patty Jenkins have been spotted together in Paris, where these were taken. Patty might even be in some of those pics.
  1. Piotr Rudnicki
    April 29, 2016
    Oh, OK then :)
Captain DC
April 28, 2016
Wayne Enterprises is supposed to be pretty global, so it's probably just a little Easter egg. She could be anywhere. OR, Diana's TOTALLY on her way to Bruce's Glasshouse.
1. The Dark Knight
  April 29, 2016
  WonderBat confirmed?
IamTheOneWhoKnocks
April 28, 2016
I was thinking maybe towards the end of Wonder Woman we'll see her looking for the other Justice League members, given that JL part 1 comes right after.....it would make sense. Actually, Batman would make sense to appear towards the end if they go this route, but I will be totally fine if its not in his physical form, like a call or computer messages like they did in BvS.
1. BROWN_KNIGHT 4 Trump
  April 28, 2016
  I think an aquaman and shazam mention would be excellent...
  1. IamTheOneWhoKnocks
    April 28, 2016
    That would be great!
    1. BROWN_KNIGHT 4 Trump
      April 29, 2016
      Yes it would be..

Browse By Topic

Browse By Year

Browse By Author

This is an archive of Batman-News.com from 2010 to 2025. For the latest news, check out BatmanNews.com